
Technology Enabled Care for the
21st Century
< Back | Next
>
The Role of Intensivists
The beneficial effects of dedicated critical care specialist physician
care on ICU mortality and costs have been clearly demonstrated in
the literature:
- Pronovost
P, Jenckes MW, Dorman T, et al: Organizational characteristics
of intensive care units related to outcomes of abdominal aortic
surgery. JAMA 281 (14):1310-1317, 1999.
- Hanson
CW, Deutschman CS, Anderson HL, et al: The effect of an organized
critical care service on outcomes and resource utilization: A
prospective cohort study. Crit Care Med 27 (2):270-274, 1999.
- Manthous
CA, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Al-Kharrat T: Effects of a medical intensivist
on patient care in a community teaching hospital. Mayo Clin Proc
72:391-99, 1997.
The
Leapfrog Group, a consortium that includes Fortune 500 companies,
JCAHO, CMS (formerly HCFA) and large insurers, has identified ICU
staffing with dedicated intensivists as one of its three initial
hospital safety measures (along with computer physician order entry
and volume based hospital referral).
In addition to being a valuable resource, intensivists are in short supply
(<10% dedicated intensivist care). With the increasing demands of an
aging population this scarcity is expected to worsen. The Committee on
Manpower for Pulmonary and Critical Care Societies (formed by the American
College of Chest Physicians, the American Thoracic Society, and the Society
of Critical Care Medicine) was created to examine the current and projected
need for critical care services. Because of a projected increase in demand
in conjunction with no increased supply of intensivists, the committee
predicted a shortfall of specialist hours equal to 22% of demand as defined
by existing staffing practices by 2020. Angus
DC et al, Caring for the critically ill patient, Current and projected
workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with
pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population?
JAMA, 284:2762, 2000 If ICU physician staffing is expected to meet
higher standards such as the Leapfrog guidelines, the shortfall will be
even greater. (Pronovost,
P, Waters H, Dorman, T, Impact Of Critical Care Physician Workforce For
Intensive Care Unit Physician Staffing. Current Opinion in Critical Care.
7:456, 2001) Current measures intended to increase the supply of intensivists
appear to fall far short of a solution to this problem. The eCareManager™; system
addresses this problem by leveraging intensivists over more ICU patients.
This solution satisfies the Leapfrog ICU physician staffing standard (see ICU Physician Staffing Factsheet), and may represent the only viable
means for US hospitals to achieve compliance and the improved outcomes
provided by this care model.
The Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ) has also
recognized the benefit of intensivist care (Making
Health Care Safer- A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices),
citing a 29-58% reduction in ICU mortality in units staffed by intensivists.
AHRQ also reported that intensivist management was one of the safety
measures with a high strength of evidence regarding impact and effectiveness;
and a telemedicine model of ICU care was noted as a possible solution
to the discrepancy between intensivist numbers and need. The ability
of telemedicine to reduce the incidence of major complications in
critical care medicine was demonstrated in a study by Rosenfeld
and co-workers where risk-adjusted ICU mortality fell by 50% and
complications decreased by 40%. (Intensive
care unit telemedicine: alternate paradigm for providing continuous
intensivist care. Critical Care Medicine. 28:3925; 2000)
Availability and speed of physician
reaction
Immediately available expertise is not only an obvious advantage
in patient care, it is also a key element in critical care nursing
professional satisfaction. A study noted that 25% of pages placed
through an indirect system from the ICU were associated with a response
time = 29 minutes while an additional 25% required more than 15
minutes. (Moss
M, Trow TK, Clardy N. Differences in the response times of pages
originating from the ICU. Chest 116:1019; 1999) Furthermore,
Dr. John Kenagy, a physician visiting scholar at the Harvard Business
School has shown that "Nurses spend only a third of their time
in patient care, while they spend two-thirds of their time hunting,
documenting, and clarifying." (The
Man Who Would Save Health Care, Forbes, 12/11/2000)
The eCareManager™ solution provides immediate intensivist availability
and supports the care process using the speed and reliability of
electronic data transfer. The eICU® provides a constant response
capability for care issues that arise when onsite physicians are
not available. Moreover, the intensivist can insure that the myriad
of specialist physicians are utilized appropriately
Smart Alert systems and improved
monitoring
Monitors are only useful when capable personnel interpret and act
upon the data. VISICU's eSolutions provide a combination of air
traffic control and on-board alerts to increase patient safety.
eCareManager™ Smart Alerts®; provide a mechanism for 'pushing' essential
information onto the critical care radar screen for interpretation
and reaction. While the number of variables that the human mind
can successfully address is limited (4-7 data constructs) (Morris
AH, Developing and Implementing Computerized Protocols for Standardization
of Clinical Decisions, Ann Int Med, 132:373, 2000), smart alerts
allow for hundreds of variables to be examined in many patients
simultaneously. Furthermore, the eICU® provides a platform to ensure
that problems are responded to immediately. This creates redundancy
in the critical care monitoring system escalated by Leape (Error
in Medicine, JAMA, 272:1851; 1994).
< Back |
Next>
|